Can we maybe just admit a few things to each other here, dear reader? Like, maybe my RSS reader is painfully choked with (quickly staling) kernels of wisdom from bloggers the world-over ... and that by falling off the reading wagon for only a few days (maybe a week), they've run so amok that I will likely have to delete them all and just start over...
Happily, though, I have one less unmet obligation to feel guilty about - as Eric Kintz's recent article 'Why Blog Post Frequency Does Not Matter Anymore' has brilliantly validated my eclectic posting and reading pace.
Which is all to say, if this is old news, I no longer have to apologize for the duplication -
The Macy's holiday TV campaign is absolutely infectious.
I admire:
- The single narrative that unites the celebrity appearances
- The choice to take the hard road and schedule multiple celebs on the same location, the same day
- The writing that leverages the public personas of the celebs to build their product brands
- The investment in a 60-second brand experience
- The all-out fun of it
- The integration of brands that touch so many ages and lifestyles - creating the effect of something you know and something to discover
I love that a department store invested in it - a strong strategy to move from forgetable 'infrastructure' to flat-out memorable brand in the retail sprint to the holiday.
I bought a Ravella Plasma TV Console at just $899 by using Macys Promo Codes........!!
Posted by: William Carson | February 04, 2008 at 02:57 AM
I can't really take issue with your analysis. The ads are compelling as ads go. That said, to my mind, it is more instructive to consider whether a $100 million ad campaign is really the antidote to Macy's lagging sales. Will the campaign sate those who decry the loss of the Marshall Field's brand (http://fieldsfanschicago.org/)? Will it sate the young cosmetics consumer who has abandoned Macy's accosting (and tired) cosmetics department in favor of Sephora?
Advertising is more effective, IMHO, when the glowing brand perception it seeks to have obtain in the audience is actually commensurate with the experience that audience has in the store. A focus on the quality of the experience had by one's customers requires stuff like, y'know, changing the corporate culture, reconsidering operational structures and so forth. Which, hey, that's hard. Can't we just run some ads?
Posted by: Eliot Frick | November 02, 2007 at 03:58 PM
While I agree with all of the points you've made, I think the most resonant aspect of these spots was their authenticity. It runs smooth and it feels like a real conversation, not a forced dialog between celebrity spokespeople. I'm not sure if this is due to fantastic coaching, well written copy or strong celebrity acting skills, but it just feels much more organic than much of the garbage we're seeing with celebrity spokespeople.
As a consumer you know it's a sales pitch, but it feels natural and invited, not fake and manufactured.
But then again, this could just be me.
Posted by: jon burg | November 02, 2007 at 10:17 AM
Leigh-
I couldn't agree more. And I must say I'm a little relieved that Macy's is finally giving me a reason to shop its store. I'm tired of parking in the Macy's lot in the mall (because it's the only place I can find space) and walking through its tired product assortment to get to the fun specialty store.s Now I've finally got a reason to stay!
Posted by: Molly | November 01, 2007 at 07:52 PM